Changing the World, One Post at a Time
RSS icon Home icon
  • Climate Change: the Cause Behind the Cause

    Posted on November 18th, 2009 Fate Found 3 comments

    You have all heard about the threat of climate change by now. It’s constantly in the news and rightfully so, it is likely to be on of the biggest threats to just about everything over the coming century. Governments are now all fully aware of the causes of climate change and what must be done to prevent it. In a matter of weeks the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference (COP15) will host representatives of the worlds biggest polluters in a effort to reach a deal on taking actions on emissions over the next 50 years.

    China Emissions

    But what will be achieved? There are two sides to the conference. Developed Nations and Developing Nations. Developed Nations are those such as USA, Britain and rich western nations, that essentially became developed threw their mass consumption of fossil fuels over the past 2 centuries. Developing Nations are countries such as China and India and many other poorer nations that historically have emitted much less climate warming gasses emitted from burning fossil fuels. But these developing nations need to continue to use fossil fuels to power their economies to bring their people out of poverty. Whereas developed nations already have a much higher percentage of their population living a better quality of life.

    Only a deal on a global scale will do, Developing countries like China and India are already fast becoming the worlds largest emitters of greenhouse gasses. But these countries argue that they are less historically responsible for climate change, having emitted less over time than developed countries such as the USA. As a result China and India will not sign a deal that prevents them from continuing to grow over the coming decades, claiming the USA and other developed countries should make up for their historical responsibility and face harsher restrictions. Naturally the USA will not sign any agreement that will damage themselves economically such as capping emissions from their businesses. Which brings us to what this conference will really be about: Money.

    moneyThe problem with the political system is money. Money is power. Politicians will not make any decisions without putting their economy first. Over half the world still lives in poverty. Millions don’t even have food to eat or clean water to drink. Yet world leaders spent Trillions of Dollars, Pounds and Euro’s propping up failed businesses in fear their collapse would damage their economies, there for damaging their power. A tiny fraction of the money spent bailing out the banks could have ended world hunger. The grand sum could have ended poverty for Millions if not Billions of people. So we now live in a world where out banks, full of stuff that doesn’t really exist, are put before people. But not only people, the planet and everything on it.

    The reason a deal (or at least a deal that actually meets the recommendations of climate scientists) is unlikely is simply because the decisions are up to politicians. Politicians who care only about how damaging a emissions cap may be to their economies. But if by some miracle a appropriate deal is achieved, money lost from damages economies will likely be recouped by increasing taxes, so it is us the people who really pay the price, at a time where we will be also be paying off the debt of the banking system that failed us. Which leads me on to the real cause of climate change.

    Over-consumption is all around us and exists with nearly everything we do. Over-consumption is the simple fact that most of the worlds resources are finite. The fact of the matter is we consumer far more than we give back to the world. The society we live in is unsustainable, just like the banking system, when we carry on consuming more than is created. So that is essentially the biggest problem we face, so why aren’t politicians doing anything about it? Because it is consumption that is the fuel that drives their economies and gives them more power. When asked what the American people should do the day after the September 11th attacks, G.W Bush replied simply “Shop”.

    99% of everything purchased in the United States is consumed or thrown away within 6 months. These things need resources to make, and massive amounts of power to manufacture, power that comes from fossil fuels that in turn further warm the climate.

    The problem of Over-consumption is a problem that simply has to be solved, now or when its too late. A small step to reduce over-consumption could in reality eclipse any actions on reducing emissions that are likely to come out of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference. But it wont happen. Why? Because Over-Consumption makes the resources we use in every day life finite. If its finite you can regulate the cost of it, simply supply and demand. If there is less of something and more people want/need it, it is worth more than if its plentiful.

    This is why oil companies purposely do not dig for new oil until their reserve levels are very low, because they less they have available, the more its worth.

    Unless there is a drastic change in politics over the next 5 years, I expect our environment and the people of this world will be prioritised below our economies. So long as that is the case its a very sad world we live in. One that might not be around much longer.

    Share This:
    • TwitThis
    • Facebook
    • Digg
     

    3 responses to “Climate Change: the Cause Behind the Cause”

    1. Ove

      Of cause the problem is money, money is our medium of exchange its what making us able to by stuff(not only fancy cars but also necessities like health-care, food and shelter). If all the countries whom has a representative in the climate change Copenhagen conference sign for a cap and trade deal is it predicted that the economic growth of the world goes down by 1-2 %, which is not that bad, but the compound effect of this would cause massive lack of growth which we could have achieved. Second, few people can predict the future in short terms, who can predict it in the long run?

    2. Tammy Mattheis

      Blog looks great and I’ve been chugging through content! You share some great opinions and insight here. Always looking for motivating blogs to keep mine going!

    3. Georgette Odaniel

      I don’t know why bing sent me to your site but I feel I should say I have become overall fascinated by the comments you have pulled together. How many years did it take to end up with this many WWW users to your site? I am fairly to this WWW thing.

    Leave a reply